Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Animalists like Olson argue we are fundamentally human or... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Personal identity over time is constituted by psychological continuity rather than memory alone

    Animalists like Olson argue we are fundamentally human organisms, so personal identity must track the persistence conditions of biological entities, not mental states.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.We are fundamentally biological entities; our existence depends on continuous organism functioning, not metaphysical continuity of consciousness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Mental continuity criteria face the transplant problem: if my brain were transplanted, the organism criterion better explains personal identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Biological persistence is objective and verifiable; psychological criteria rely on contested theories of memory and psychological connectedness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Intuition strongly suggests a person could survive with a different body but same mind; animalism cannot accommodate this possibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Brain-transplant thought experiments suggest we follow our psychology, not our original organism, revealing mental criteria's explanatory power.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Animalism makes personal identity criteria no different from animal identity criteria, yet persons seem to have special metaphysical properties organisms lack.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Personal Identity1 linked

    Related

    Animalism makes personal identity criteria no different from animal identity cri...Biological persistence is objective and verifiable; psychological criteria rely ...Brain-transplant thought experiments suggest we follow our psychology, not our o...Intuition strongly suggests a person could survive with a different body but sam...
    +3 moreShow less
    Mental continuity criteria face the transplant problem: if my brain were transpl...Personal identity over time is constituted by psychological continuity rather th...We are fundamentally biological entities; our existence depends on continuous or...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit