Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Another agent (Black) would have intervened to make Jones... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Moral responsibility does not require an ability to do otherwise.

    Another agent (Black) would have intervened to make Jones perform the action had Jones shown any sign of not performing it, but Black does not actually intervene.

    Moral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral Responsibility

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Moral responsibility does not require an ability to do otherwise.

    Related

    In Frankfurt cases, an agent (Jones) performs an action on his own and for his o...Moral responsibility does not require an ability to do otherwise.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Therefore, Jones could not have done otherwise.
    Yet Jones seems morally responsible for his behavior, since given Black's non-in...

    Similar

    For an agent S to have an ability to perform action A, it is necessary...80%Though he did not do so, Jones might have given Black some indication ...78%All agents other than God both act and are acted upon78%If an agent's actions are the unavoidable consequences of things over ...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-responsibility
    View source passageHide passage
    Another influential trend in compatibilism has been to argue that moral responsibility does not require an ability to do otherwise. If this is right, then determinism would not threaten responsibility by ruling out access to behavioral alternatives (though determinism might threaten responsibility in other ways: see van Inwagen 1983: 182–88 and Fischer & Ravizza 1998: 151–168). In a very influential 1969 paper, Harry Frankfurt offers examples meant to show that an agent can be morally responsible for an action even if he could not have done otherwise. Versions of these examples are often c...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective