Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Any purported conception of a non-mental object still dep... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→We cannot even conceive of non-mental objects

    Any purported conception of a non-mental object still deploys categories (substance, persistence, unity) that are, on Kantian grounds, contributions of the understanding rather than features of things-in-themselves.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Categories (in Kant's philosophy)(as the cognitive tools Kant thought were necessary for understanding)
    Basic mental structures or frameworks that Kant believed our brains use automatically to organize and make sense of all experiences—like organizing everything into concepts like cause-and-effect, space, and time.
    Kant / Kantian(as the philosopher whose theory is being discussed)
    Immanuel Kant was an 18th-century German philosopher who argued that our minds actively shape how we experience the world, rather than passively receiving it. 'Kantian' means relating to his ideas.
    conception(as used in epistemology (the study of knowledge))
    An idea or mental image that your mind creates about something, which may or may not match reality perfectly.
    non-mental object(in distinguishing between the mind and the external world)
    Something that exists outside your mind—like a chair, a tree, or a rock—as opposed to thoughts, feelings, or ideas that happen inside your head.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    persistence(Weyl's distinction between two kinds of constancy)
    Constancy maintained because a quantity is isolated and undisturbed, as opposed to actively adjusted
    substance(Spinoza's metaphysics; criteria include (i) necessity and (ii) self-subsistence)
    The fundamental existent that is wholly necessary and self-subsistent, not depending on anything else for its existence
    things-in-themselves(Kantian metaphysics)
    The intrinsic nature of objects as they exist independently of human perception and cognition, about which Kant claims we lack substantive knowledge
    understanding (the faculty of)(the source of universality in this framework)
    In Kant's philosophy, the mental power that takes raw sensory information and organizes it using concepts and rules to create knowledge.
    unity(Derived from being by adding the notion of indivision alone.)
    Being that is undivided; the concept of being with the purely negative addition of indivision.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedPerception1 linked

    Related

    We cannot even conceive of non-mental objects

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective