Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Anyone can reasonably reject a principle on the grounds t... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The contractualist apparatus of reasonable rejection is redundant

    Anyone can reasonably reject a principle on the grounds that it permits actions that are wrong

    Moral ResponsibilitySocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilitySocial Contract

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Truth & Knowledge
    2 linked

    Related

    Contractualism holds that an action x is wrong if and only if x is forbidden by ...If we do already know which actions are wrong, we do not need the contractualist...If we do not already know which actions are wrong, we cannot use the contractual...The contractualist apparatus of reasonable rejection is redundant
    +1 moreShow less
    Therefore, a principle that no one can reasonably reject is a principle that per...

    Similar

    If a principle can be rejected whenever it treats someone unfairly, th...89%Therefore, a principle that no one can reasonably reject is a principl...88%Contractualism holds that an action x is wrong if and only if x is for...87%Contractualist justification requires that a principle not be reasonab...86%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: contractualism
    View source passageHide passage
    As we saw in section 3.2, contractualism allows for the reasonable rejection of principles on grounds other than their direct impact on the individual’s well-being. However, this appeal to reasons beyond well-being brings out a common objection to contractualism—that the whole apparatus of reasonable rejection is redundant. The objection is as follows. Contractualism says x is wrong if and only if x is forbidden by principles no-one can reasonably reject. Anyone can reasonably reject a principle

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective