Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Contractualist justification requires that a principle no... — Carmelics
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A principle permitting doctors to harvest patients' organs for transplant does not provide justified exception to the general duty to aid patients.

    Contractualist justification requires that a principle not be reasonably rejectable by those subject to it.

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertySocial Contract

    Connections

    2 topics

    Bioethics2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Justice & Punishment
    1 linked

    Related

    A principle permitting doctors to harvest patients' organs for transplant does n...Prospective patients could reasonably reject a principle permitting doctors to w...

    Similar

    Anyone can reasonably reject a principle on the grounds that it permit...86%Contractualist principles must be justified to each person by citing r...85%Therefore, a principle that no one can reasonably reject is a principl...85%Under contractualism, a principle is impermissible if any individual h...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: contractualism
    View source passageHide passage
    For the contractualist, justification to others provides the standard that determines which considerations count decisively against particular actions. In transplant cases, the contractualist question is whether the possibility of saving lives via transplant justifies an exception to the general duty to aid one’s patients. Scanlon argues that it does not do so, because a principle permitting such an exception could reasonably be rejected by prospective patients. If doctors withhold treatment bec

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective