Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Aquinas holds that God's simplicity is compatible with re... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The First is simple, i.e., has no internal composition

    Aquinas holds that God's simplicity is compatible with real conceptual distinctions between divine attributes like goodness and power.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Conceptual distinctions can be real without corresponding to ontological divisions in the thing itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Human intellect grasps divine perfections through multiple finite concepts necessarily, even if God is one simple being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Classical theology requires both divine simplicity and real attribute distinctions to preserve God's transcendence and perfection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If conceptual distinctions lack any basis in reality, they appear arbitrary and God's nature seems fundamentally unknowable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Absolute simplicity means no distinction whatsoever between God and His attributes, making 'real conceptual' distinctions incoherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Aquinas's distinction between conceptual and real differences lacks clear metaphysical grounding and invites infinite regress.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Natural Theology1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Absolute simplicity means no distinction whatsoever between God and His attribut...Aquinas's distinction between conceptual and real differences lacks clear metaph...Classical theology requires both divine simplicity and real attribute distinctio...Conceptual distinctions can be real without corresponding to ontological divisio...
    +3 moreShow less
    Human intellect grasps divine perfections through multiple finite concepts neces...If conceptual distinctions lack any basis in reality, they appear arbitrary and ...The First is simple, i.e., has no internal composition

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit