Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Aquinas holds that God's simplicity is compatible with real conceptual distinctions between divine attributes like goodness and power.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
If conceptual distinctions lack any basis in reality, they appear arbitrary and God's nature seems fundamentally unknowable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Absolute simplicity means no distinction whatsoever between God and His attributes, making 'real conceptual' distinctions incoherent.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Aquinas's distinction between conceptual and real differences lacks clear metaphysical grounding and invites infinite regress.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Conceptual distinctions can be real without corresponding to ontological divisions in the thing itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Human intellect grasps divine perfections through multiple finite concepts necessarily, even if God is one simple being.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Classical theology requires both divine simplicity and real attribute distinctions to preserve God's transcendence and perfection.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.