Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Aristotle's doctrine of function (ergon) holds that an ob... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A merely useful object is not in itself whole or complete

    Aristotle's doctrine of function (ergon) holds that an object achieves its fullest being precisely when it excellently fulfills its proper function.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Observable natural entities (eyes, hearts, knives) demonstrably perform specific functions that define their identity and value.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Excellence in any domain (medicine, athletics, craftsmanship) is universally understood as optimal performance of one's proper role.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Human flourishing (eudaimonia) requires actualizing our distinctive rational capacities, which presupposes a proper human function.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Objects often achieve fulfillment through unintended purposes; a fork makes excellent art despite lacking that in its design function.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Humans lack a single unambiguous function—we create meaning pluralistically, unlike organs with biologically fixed purposes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Deriving 'ought' from 'is' commits the naturalistic fallacy; a thing's function doesn't entail it should pursue that function.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Aesthetics1 linked

    Related

    A merely useful object is not in itself whole or completeDeriving 'ought' from 'is' commits the naturalistic fallacy; a thing's function ...Excellence in any domain (medicine, athletics, craftsmanship) is universally und...Human flourishing (eudaimonia) requires actualizing our distinctive rational cap...
    +3 moreShow less
    Humans lack a single unambiguous function—we create meaning pluralistically, unl...Objects often achieve fulfillment through unintended purposes; a fork makes exce...Observable natural entities (eyes, hearts, knives) demonstrably perform specific...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit