Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Aristotle takes teleological causes as already establishe... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→In Physics ii 8, Aristotle is not arguing for teleology from the ground up but is observing that phenomena occurring always or for the most part are good candidates for teleological explanation

    Aristotle takes teleological causes as already established rather than arguing for them

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Natural Theology
    1 linked

    Related

    In Physics ii 8, Aristotle is not arguing for teleology from the ground up but i...Natural phenomena that occur always or for the most part admit of teleological e...This reading avoids ascribing a contradiction to Aristotle regarding his own cou...

    Similar

    In Physics ii 8, Aristotle is not arguing for teleology from the groun...81%Either Aristotle is not correctly interpreted as arguing for teleology...78%Whatever happens always or for the most part must happen for the sake ...78%If teleology is taken seriously, everything about a thing is to be exp...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: aristotle
    View source passageHide passage
    If so much captures Aristotle’s dominant argument for teleology, then his view is unmotivated. The argument is problematic in the first instance because it assumes an exhaustive and exclusive disjunction between what is by chance and what is for the sake of something. But there are obviously other possibilities. Hearts beat not in order to make noise, but they do so always and not by chance. Second, and this is perplexing if we have represented him correctly, Aristotle is himself aware of one s

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective