Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Whatever happens always or for the most part must happen ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Whatever happens always or for the most part must happen for the sake of something and must admit of a teleological cause.

    CausationNatural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Nature exhibits regularity, with parts of nature coming about in patterned and regular ways.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Things happen either by chance or for the sake of something (exhaustive and exclusive disjunction).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.What happens always or for the most part happens in a patterned and predictable way.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Regularities can be fully explained by efficient and material causes without invoking final causes, as Democritus and modern mechanism demonstrate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The appearance of teleological order in regular natural processes is adequately explained by selection effects: structures lacking regularity simply do not persist.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hume's critique establishes that regularity in nature licenses only inductive generalization, not inference to purposive causation as an ontological feature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.P2's disjunction between chance and teleology is not exhaustive: deterministic material necessity constitutes a third category reducible to neither.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Spinoza's natura naturans demonstrates that necessary causal emanation from substance produces lawlike regularity without any final causation or intentional directedness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Natural TheologyCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Hume's critique establishes that regularity in nature licenses only inductive ge...Nature exhibits regularity, with parts of nature coming about in patterned and r...P2's disjunction between chance and teleology is not exhaustive: deterministic m...Regularities can be fully explained by efficient and material causes without inv...
    +5 moreShow less
    Spinoza's natura naturans demonstrates that necessary causal emanation from subs...The appearance of teleological order in regular natural processes is adequately ...Things happen either by chance or for the sake of something (exhaustive and excl...What happens always or for the most part happens in a patterned and predictable ...What happens in a patterned and predictable way cannot plausibly be due to chanc...

    Similar

    Natural phenomena that occur always or for the most part admit of tele...84%Aristotle takes teleological causes as already established rather than...78%A final cause is that for the sake of which something occurs.76%Whatever comes to be has a cause75%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: aristotle
    View source passageHide passage
    In this argument Aristotle seems to introduce as a phainomenon that nature exhibits regularity, so that the parts of nature come about in patterned and regular ways. Thus, for instance, humans tend to have teeth arranged in a predictable sort of way, with incisors in the front and molars in the back. He then seems to contend, as an exhaustive and exclusive disjunction, that things happen either by chance or for the sake of something, only to suggest, finally, that what is ‘always or for the mo
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit