Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Authors such as Polkinghorne and Murphy commit a category mistake in locating divine action within physical indeterminacy
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
God is not a cause in the same sense that creatures are causes
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
God does not compete with natural causes as a cause of the same type
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
God as primary cause supports and grounds secondary (natural) causes rather than replacing them
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Show 1 more premise
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Browse more in Natural Theology
Related propositions within the same area of thought.