Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Authors such as Polkinghorne and Murphy commit a category... — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Authors such as Polkinghorne and Murphy commit a category mistake in locating divine action within physical indeterminacy

    Natural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.God is not a cause in the same sense that creatures are causes
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.God does not compete with natural causes as a cause of the same type
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.God as primary cause supports and grounds secondary (natural) causes rather than replacing them
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural Theology

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    God as primary cause supports and grounds secondary (natural) causes rather than...God does not compete with natural causes as a cause of the same typeGod is not a cause in the same sense that creatures are causesGod therefore does not need physical indeterminacy in order to act in the world

    Similar

    God therefore does not need physical indeterminacy in order to act in ...76%It is a philosophical mistake to seek a cause of an eternal or beginni...76%Belief in creation is unwarranted if Aristotle is correct about the fi...74%God, for Fârâbî, does not fall under any Aristotelian category.73%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: religion-science
    View source passageHide passage
    Advances in twentieth-century physics, including the theories of general and special relativity, chaos theory, and quantum theory, overturned the mechanical clockwork view of creation. In the latter half of the twentieth century, chaos theory and quantum physics have been explored as possible avenues to reinterpret divine action. John Polkinghorne (1998) proposed that chaos theory not only presents epistemological limits to what we can know about the world, but that it also provides the world wi
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit