Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Auxiliary arguments, even if less philosophically compell... — Carmelics
    Home/Virtue Ethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A non-wise Stoic may legitimately rely on weaker, auxiliary arguments to reinforce ethical beliefs.

    Auxiliary arguments, even if less philosophically compelling than primary Stoic arguments, can serve a practical reinforcing function.

    ConsequentialismVirtue Ethics
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Virtue EthicsConsequentialism

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Virtue Ethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility
    2 linked

    Related

    A non-wise Stoic may legitimately rely on weaker, auxiliary arguments to reinfor...A non-wise person's beliefs are weak and unstable.According to Stoic doctrine, only the beliefs of a fully virtuous and wise perso...Weak and unstable beliefs require supplementary support to withstand moments of ...

    Similar

    The basic thrust of the argument is nevertheless strong if understood ...76%Mill's argument, though poorly framed, retains substantial force when ...74%A pragmatic argument provides strong support for theism only if it giv...73%Some of Rehberg's arguments instead tend to demonstrate the impossibil...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: marcus-aurelius
    View source passageHide passage
    We also see Marcus’ reliance on Stoic physics in his innovative derivation of the Stoic doctrine of the indifference of everything except virtue and vice from providence. Since wealth, reputation, and health are distributed among the virtuous and the vicious indiscriminately, he reasons, they cannot be good, for that would be contrary to providence (ii.11). This does not mean Marcus is generally grounding ethics in physics, however.[6] According to the Stoics, the beliefs of anyone other tha

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective