Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    The basic thrust of the argument is nevertheless strong i... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Mill's argument, though poorly framed, retains substantial force when understood on its own terms

    The basic thrust of the argument is nevertheless strong if understood in terms of its own aims

    ConsequentialismNo other argument is better
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    ConsequentialismNo other argument is better

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language3 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    'Desirability' means worthy of being desired, not merely capable of being desire...Mill's argument, though poorly framed, retains substantial force when understood...Mill's framing is admittedly unfortunateThe analogy between 'desired'/'desirable' and 'heard'/'audible' is linguisticall...

    Similar

    Mill's argument, though poorly framed, retains substantial force when ...77%Auxiliary arguments, even if less philosophically compelling than prim...76%Different argumentative goals require different norms and rules beyond...72%A pragmatic argument provides strong support for theism only if it giv...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mill
    View source passageHide passage
    G.E. Moore famously attacks this argument, suggesting that “the fallacy in this step is so obvious, that is quite wonderful how Mill failed to see it” (Moore 1993: 118). ‘Desired’ does not bear the same relation to ‘desirable’ as ‘heard’ does to ‘audible’—for desirability is the property of being deserving or worthy of being desired, whereas audibility is property of being capable of being heard. Mill’s choice of framing the argument in this way is, admittedly, unfortunate, but the basic thrust

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective