Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Because idealists and skeptics do not believe that a mate... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Moore's proof is dialectically flawed and unsuccessful for convincing idealists or external world skeptics that a material world exists

    Because idealists and skeptics do not believe that a material world exists, they are rationally required to distrust any perceptual evidence offered in favor of the premise that Moore holds up a hand

    PerceptionSkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismPerception

    Key Terms

    Moore(Moore's proof refers to his famous argument for the existence of external objects)
    G.E. Moore was an influential 20th-century philosopher known for defending common sense claims (like 'this is a hand') against skeptical arguments that doubt what we can know about the world.
    Perceptual evidence(as used in epistemology)
    Information you gather directly through your senses—what you see, hear, feel, taste, or smell.
    Rationally required

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (as used in epistemology and philosophy of mind)
    Something that logic and good reasoning demand you do, even if you don't want to.
    Skeptics(as a philosophical position on what we can know)
    People who doubt that we can really know things, especially whether our senses are giving us accurate information about the world.
    idealists(Used to classify Plato, Aristotle, Leibniz, and Kant)
    Thinkers who posit more ideas or forms than are necessary to explain thought
    material world(Moore's proof of an external world)
    A world containing material objects that exist in space.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge3 linked

    Related

    Idealists and global skeptics do not believe that a material world existsMoore's proof is dialectically flawed and unsuccessful for convincing idealists ...The purpose of Moore's proof is to convince idealists and external world skeptic...Therefore, idealists and skeptics will reject Moore's proof as based on an unjus...

    Similar

    Idealists and global skeptics do not believe that a material world exi...86%Moore's proof is dialectically flawed and unsuccessful for convincing ...83%Therefore, idealists and skeptics will reject Moore's proof as based o...82%The purpose of Moore's proof is to convince idealists and external wor...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: transmission-justification-warrant
    View source passageHide passage
    The dogmatist argues (or may argue), however, that Moore’s proof is dialectically flawed (cf. Pryor 2004). The contention is that Moore’s is unsuccessful because it is useless for the purpose to convince the idealist or the external world sceptic that there is a material world. In short, the idealist and the global sceptic don’t believe that there is a material world. Since the idealist and the sceptic don’t believe Q8, they are rationally required to distrust any perceptual evidence offered in

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective