Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Moore's proof is dialectically flawed and unsuccessful fo... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Moore's proof is dialectically flawed and unsuccessful for convincing idealists or external world skeptics that a material world exists

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    2 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' shows that Moore's proof begs the question by treating as a premise what skeptics place in doubt.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A valid argument that assumes its conclusion's presuppositions cannot transmit justification to someone who denies those presuppositions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Since skeptics deny the reliability of perception globally, Moore's perceptual premise 'I have a hand' inherits exactly the doubt the proof was meant to resolve.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Crispin Wright's transmission-failure thesis establishes that warrant does not always transmit across valid inference when the conclusion is a precondition for trusting the premise.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Moore's inference from 'here is a hand' to 'an external world exists' fails transmission because the existence of the external world is a precondition for the perceptual warrant behind the premise itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.An argument that presupposes what it concludes in its evidential base is dialectically circular and cannot rationally move a disputant who rejects that base.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.The purpose of Moore's proof is to convince idealists and external world skeptics that a material world exists
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Idealists and global skeptics do not believe that a material world exists
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Because idealists and skeptics do not believe that a material world exists, they are rationally required to distrust any perceptual evidence offered in favor of the premise that Moore holds up a hand
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Perception1 linked

    Related

    A valid argument that assumes its conclusion's presuppositions cannot transmit j...An argument that presupposes what it concludes in its evidential base is dialect...Because idealists and skeptics do not believe that a material world exists, they...Crispin Wright's transmission-failure thesis establishes that warrant does not a...
    +6 moreShow less
    Idealists and global skeptics do not believe that a material world existsMoore's inference from 'here is a hand' to 'an external world exists' fails tran...Since skeptics deny the reliability of perception globally, Moore's perceptual p...The purpose of Moore's proof is to convince idealists and external world skeptic...Therefore, idealists and skeptics will reject Moore's proof as based on an unjus...Wittgenstein's 'On Certainty' shows that Moore's proof begs the question by trea...

    Similar

    The purpose of Moore's proof is to convince idealists and external wor...92%Because idealists and skeptics do not believe that a material world ex...83%Therefore, idealists and skeptics will reject Moore's proof as based o...82%Our inability to conceive of a possible world in which SK is true give...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: transmission-justification-warrant
    View source passageHide passage
    The dogmatist argues (or may argue), however, that Moore’s proof is dialectically flawed (cf. Pryor 2004). The contention is that Moore’s is unsuccessful because it is useless for the purpose to convince the idealist or the external world sceptic that there is a material world. In short, the idealist and the global sceptic don’t believe that there is a material world. Since the idealist and the sceptic don’t believe Q8, they are rationally required to distrust any perceptual evidence offered in
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (2 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit