Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Being exhibits properties—contingency, resistance, opacit... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Thinking and being are not fundamentally opposed but are ultimately the same.

    Being exhibits properties—contingency, resistance, opacity—that are irreducible to and independent of any cognitive or conceptual structure.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Physical systems exhibit causal powers (gravity, radioactive decay) that operate identically whether or not minds observe them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We encounter genuine epistemic limits: some phenomena resist complete conceptualization, suggesting mind-independent recalcitrance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If being were entirely concept-dependent, the history of science couldn't reveal surprising properties we didn't antecedently structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Any claim about being's properties is necessarily made within a conceptual framework; asserting independence presupposes the ability to step outside structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Contingency, resistance, and opacity are themselves concepts; their attribution to being already ensnares them in the cognitive structures they claim to transcend.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.We lack access to being-in-itself independent of experience; appeals to mind-independent properties rely on an unverifiable metaphysical leap.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedConsciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    Any claim about being's properties is necessarily made within a conceptual frame...Contingency, resistance, and opacity are themselves concepts; their attribution ...If being were entirely concept-dependent, the history of science couldn't reveal...Physical systems exhibit causal powers (gravity, radioactive decay) that operate...
    +3 moreShow less
    Thinking and being are not fundamentally opposed but are ultimately the same.We encounter genuine epistemic limits: some phenomena resist complete conceptual...We lack access to being-in-itself independent of experience; appeals to mind-ind...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit