Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Believers who regard God as supremely moral must reject t... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Basing moral knowledge on knowledge of God's will is viciously circular

    Believers who regard God as supremely moral must reject the view that God's will is arbitrary or lacks a moral basis

    Against an attribute of GodDivine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesAgainst an attribute of God

    Connections

    3 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Justice & Punishment
    2 linked
    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Basing moral knowledge on knowledge of God's will is viciously circularEither God forbids genocide because genocide is wrong, or genocide is wrong beca...If God forbids genocide because genocide is wrong, then the wrongness of genocid...If genocide is wrong because God forbids it, then God's will is arbitrary or lac...
    +1 moreShow less
    If the wrongness of genocide is logically prior to God's will, then appealing to...

    Similar

    An appeal to God's will that presupposes independent moral wrongness c...83%If God's mere will constituted right and wrong, then any contradiction...80%If God's mere will constituted right and wrong, then arbitrarily conde...80%If the good is good because God commands it, then the content of moral...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: moral-epistemology
    View source passageHide passage
    The latter problem arises from a dilemma posed in Plato’s Euthyphro. In this dialogue Euthyphro tries to explain to Socrates that piety is what the gods love. Socrates then asks Euthyphro whether the gods love the pious because they are good or whether the pious are good because the gods love them. To put the dilemma in terms relevant to the present context, consider the view that genocide is wrong because it is contrary to God’s will. (The argument doesn’t change if we talk about commandments o

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective