Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Berkeley's idealism does deny the existence of things dis... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Kant's transcendental idealism is not equivalent to Berkeley's idealism

    Berkeley's idealism does deny the existence of things distinct from minds and representations

    Consciousness & MindPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    3 topics

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Perception
    2 linked
    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    Kant denies that spatiality and temporality belong to things as they are in them...Kant provides no reason to deny that there are things distinct from our represen...Kant's transcendental idealism is not equivalent to Berkeley's idealism

    Similar

    Hume's position rejects the existence of mental substances (human or d...86%Berkeley's idealism is committed to the existence of mental substances...86%Under Berkeley's idealism, things are ideas perceived by the mind of G...86%Berkeley's idealism holds that all that exists is finite minds and the...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: idealism
    View source passageHide passage
    In a passage added to the second edition of the Critique, Kant also points out that by arguing for the “transcendental ideality” of spatio-temporality—that it is a necessary feature of our representations of things but not a feature of things as they are in themselves at all—he does not mean to degrade space to a “mere illusion”, as did “the good Berkeley” (B 71): his position is that it is a subjective but necessary feature of our way of representing things, similar to secondary qualities such

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective