Black's two-sphere universe contains no relational or qualitative asymmetry; any apparent distinction collapses into bare numerical difference, which presupposes rather than explains non-identity.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Black's two-sphere universe(the main subject being discussed): A thought experiment by philosopher Max Black imagining two identical spheres existing in otherwise empty space, used to explore whether two things can be truly different if they have exactly the same properties.
Non-Identity(Used to establish that each newly introduced form of likeness (L2, L3, ...) is distinct from its predecessors): The principle that a form is numerically distinct from the particulars (or other forms) that partake of it
Presupposes(as describing what Plantinga's argument takes for granted): Assumes something to be true without proving it—like how an argument might presuppose that logic works, without first arguing that logic is valid.
Relational asymmetry(as describing the one-way or uneven nature of God's relationship with creation): The idea that a relationship might work differently depending on which direction you look at it—like how a parent affects a child in a different way than a child affects a parent.

Based on where you are in your exploration