Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Bodies are well-founded phenomena rather than mere incohe... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Personal Identity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Bodies are well-founded phenomena rather than mere incoherent dreams or fictions.

    Personal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Bodies result from aggregates of simple substances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Simple substances are real beings.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A phenomenon that has its foundation in real beings is a well-founded phenomenon, not a mere illusion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The unity conditions Leibniz attributes to monads are imposed by perceiving minds, not discovered in mind-independent reality (Kant, CPR A100–110).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If phenomenal coherence depends on mental synthesis rather than monadic aggregation, bodies derive their order from cognition, not from real simple substances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A phenomenon grounded solely in cognitive activity lacks the mind-independent foundation required to distinguish it from a well-ordered dream.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Berkeley demonstrates that the concept of material substance adds nothing explanatory beyond the structured regularities of perception itself (Principles §18–24).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If positing real simple substances beneath phenomena is explanatorily idle, Occam's razor warrants eliminating them, leaving bodies as coherent but ungrounded perceptual regularities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A phenomenon whose postulated real foundation is dispensable without explanatory loss cannot be called 'well-founded' in any substantive metaphysical sense.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Personal IdentityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    3 topics

    Causation1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linkedPerception1 linked

    Related

    A phenomenon grounded solely in cognitive activity lacks the mind-independent fo...A phenomenon that has its foundation in real beings is a well-founded phenomenon...A phenomenon whose postulated real foundation is dispensable without explanatory...Berkeley demonstrates that the concept of material substance adds nothing explan...
    +5 moreShow less
    Bodies result from aggregates of simple substances.If phenomenal coherence depends on mental synthesis rather than monadic aggregat...

    Similar

    A phenomenon that has its foundation in real beings is a well-founded ...86%Economic theories rarely postulate the existence of unobservable entit...76%Events conceived as facts or fact-like particulars are fine-grained en...76%The ultimate truth is that phenomena do not come into being.75%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: leibniz-mind
    View source passageHide passage
    According to Leibniz, bodies (qua material) are aggregates, and an aggregate, of course, is not a substance on account of its lack of unity. The claim in the above passage is that whatever being or reality an aggregate has derives from the being and reality of its constituents. Thus, Leibniz thinks that if a body is to have any reality at all, if it is to be more than a mere “phenomenon, lacking all reality as would a coherent dream,” then it must ultimately be composed of things which are real
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    If positing real simple substances beneath phenomena is explanatorily idle, Occa...
    Simple substances are real beings.
    The unity conditions Leibniz attributes to monads are imposed by perceiving mind...
    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit