Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Bodily feelings can themselves carry intentional content without involving cognitive evaluation, as Prinz argues via 'embodied appraisals'.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Bodily feelings lack the structured propositional form ('about X as Y') that genuine intentionality requires; they're mere causally-triggered states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
What appears to be direct bodily intentionality actually depends on learned associations and background cognitive frameworks built over time.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The intentional content we attribute to bodily feelings is retroactively imposed by cognitive interpretation, not intrinsic to the sensation itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Pre-cognitive bodily responses (e.g., gut tightening at threat) demonstrate content about danger before conscious evaluation occurs.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Evolution selected for rapid bodily appraisals that bypass reasoning, suggesting intentionality doesn't require cognitive processing.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Patients with cognitive impairments retain emotional bodily responses, indicating intentional content can exist independently of cognition.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.