Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Boethius himself in De Hebdomadibus treats this distincti... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The claims that God is esse and God is id quod est are not genuinely contradictory.

    Boethius himself in De Hebdomadibus treats this distinction as logically real, not merely linguistic, since it grounds the difference between God and creatures.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Boethius needed a real distinction to explain why God's essence equals His existence while creatures' essences differ from theirs.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If essence-existence distinction were merely linguistic, it couldn't ground the metaphysical difference between divine and created being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Medieval theology requires real distinctions to avoid pantheism and preserve God's transcendence as substantively different from creatures.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Boethius may have conflated ontological priority with logical distinctness; the distinction could be real without being formally logical.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Modern analysis suggests essence-existence language may be a useful conceptual tool rather than a discovery of objective logical structure.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Boethius's texts are ambiguous about whether he endorses metaphysical realism of logical distinctions versus semantic conventionalism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Boethius may have conflated ontological priority with logical distinctness; the ...Boethius needed a real distinction to explain why God's essence equals His exist...Boethius's texts are ambiguous about whether he endorses metaphysical realism of...If essence-existence distinction were merely linguistic, it couldn't ground the ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Medieval theology requires real distinctions to avoid pantheism and preserve God...Modern analysis suggests essence-existence language may be a useful conceptual t...The claims that God is esse and God is id quod est are not genuinely contradicto...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit