BonJour's internalist cases show intuitions about epistemic justification are sensitive to coherence and conceptual relations, not causal-explanatory connections to the facts intuited, undermining the inductive generalization.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

BonJour(as a key philosopher in coherentism): Laurence BonJour is a contemporary American philosopher famous for developing and defending coherentist theories of knowledge and justification.
Inductive generalization(a type of reasoning the statement says we can't use across worlds): Reaching a broad conclusion by looking at examples and patterns—like concluding 'all swans are white' because every swan you've seen was white.
causal-explanatory connections(what the statement says internalism rejects): Direct cause-and-effect relationships that explain how something in the world actually makes something else happen.
coherence(Applied uniformly by Bosanquet to both religious and non-religious truth claims.): The standard by which truth is assessed — a belief or system of beliefs is true insofar as it forms a consistent, internally unified whole.

Based on where you are in your exploration