Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    BonJour's internalist critique establishes that a mental ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The Sellarsian dilemma undermines the epistemological role foundationalism requires of experiences

    BonJour's internalist critique establishes that a mental state can confer justification only if the subject has cognitive access to its justificatory status, which transforms the state into a belief-like entity subject to further normative assessment.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Belief-like entity(in philosophical analysis)
    Something that functions similarly to a belief—a mental state that can be evaluated as true or false and open to criticism.
    BonJour(as a key philosopher in coherentism)
    Laurence BonJour is a contemporary American philosopher famous for developing and defending coherentist theories of knowledge and justification.
    Cognitive access(as something humans lack regarding God's reasons)
    The ability of your mind to reach, understand, or be aware of something; having the mental capacity to grasp an idea.
    Confer justification(describes what these arguments can do)
    To give someone a good reason or rational support for believing something.
    Internalism(Moral psychology; used to characterize the relationship between moral judgment and motivation)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    The view that it is a logical or conceptual truth that some degree of motivation is internal to a moral judgment itself — that making a genuine moral claim entails being motivated to some degree.
    Mental state(philosophy of mind)
    A condition of your mind at a particular moment, like believing something, feeling afraid, or having a visual experience.
    Normative assessment(refers to assessing God morally or ethically)
    Judging something according to standards of what is right, wrong, good, or bad—making a moral or ethical evaluation.
    justificatory status(epistemology)
    The quality of being a good reason or piece of evidence for believing something.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Perception1 linked

    Related

    The Sellarsian dilemma undermines the epistemological role foundationalism requi...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective