Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Both similar-sign inferences (e.g., all humans are mortal... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→There is only one mode of sign-inference.

    Both similar-sign inferences (e.g., all humans are mortal because those hereabouts are mortal) and dissimilar-sign inferences (e.g., movement as a sign of void) are grounded in experiential assurance.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Dissimilar-sign inference(as used in logic and epistemology)
    A way of reasoning where you conclude something exists or is true based on indirect clues or effects—like knowing air must exist because you see things moving (the movement is the clue, but it's not air itself).
    Experiential assurance(as used in epistemology)
    Confidence or certainty that comes from your own direct experience and observation.
    Similar-sign inference

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (as used in logic and epistemology)
    A way of reasoning where you conclude something is true about a whole group based on observing it in a smaller part of that group—like saying all humans are mortal because the people you know around you die.
    grounded in(whether distinctness or identity is explained by intrinsic features)
    To be explained by or to have its reason or basis in something else—like how a tree being wet is grounded in (explained by) recent rain.
    void(Aristotle's definition, used as the basis for his argument against the existence of a void)
    Dimensional space without matter inside

    Related

    Assurance that a conclusion is true is produced in all cases by experience of si...Sign-inference proceeds by generalizing from observed similar cases to unobserve...There is only one mode of sign-inference.

    Similar

    Sensation provides signs from which humans can draw inferences (tekmai...78%The Epicurean method of sign-inference is primarily concerned with cer...76%The Eliminative Method (EM) provides a valid criterion for sign-infere...75%An inference like 'I exist, since I am walking' relies on the existenc...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: philodemus
    View source passageHide passage
    But the author of §4, at any rate, insists that it is only because we have observed that moving things hereabouts, despite other differences, all share the property of moving through empty spaces, that we affirm that the same thing holds without exception in non-evident places too (xxxv 36–xxxvi 7). The full form of this sign-inference would therefore run: “Since moving things hereabouts all move through empty space, all moving things move through empty spaces; and since all moving things move t

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective