Buchanan and the Virginia school argue that the Pareto constraint's silence on redistributive questions properly reflects the limits of scientific economics, reserving contested distributional choices for democratic constitutional processes rather than technocratic welfare judgments.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Buchanan(as the originator of the economic theory being discussed): James M. Buchanan was an American economist who won the Nobel Prize for developing constitutional economics, which studies how the rules and structures of government (like a constitution) affect economic outcomes and individual freedom.
Pareto constraint(the economic principle being discussed): A rule in economics named after an economist (Vilfredo Pareto) that says a change is only good if it makes at least one person better off without making anyone worse off.
Virginia school(the school of thought Buchanan founded): A group of economists and political thinkers (mainly at the University of Virginia) who believed markets and individual choice are better than government control, and that constitutions should limit what governments can do.
democratic constitutional processes(where the Virginia school believes distribution decisions should be made instead)

Based on where you are in your exploration