Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    By Cohen's results, there exist models N and N' both sati... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The semantics of second-order logic depend on the metatheory with respect to the Axiom of Choice.

    By Cohen's results, there exist models N and N' both satisfying the axioms of ZF without the Axiom of Choice such that the sentence θ expressing the Axiom of Choice for continuum-size families of subsets of the reals holds in N but not in N'.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Axiom of Choice(Foundations of mathematics; arises in second-order logic as the statement that every total binary relation has a choice function)
    Given a set A of non-empty pairwise disjoint sets, there exists a set B containing exactly one element from each set in A. When A is infinite, forming B requires making infinitely many simultaneous choices.
    Cohen(as a reference to mathematical results about axioms)
    Paul Cohen was a mathematician who proved in the 1960s that certain basic assumptions about infinity and sets cannot be proven true or false from the other standard rules of mathematics.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Continuum-size(as a description of the scale being discussed)
    Referring to infinity in the size of all real numbers (like all decimal points and fractions on a number line); it's the largest kind of infinity most people encounter in basic math.
    Models (in mathematical logic)(as systems that satisfy axioms)
    Different possible mathematical universes or systems that follow certain rules; think of them as alternate realities where different things might be true.
    Sentence (in logic)(as a formal logical statement)
    A mathematical statement that can be either true or false; in this case, θ (theta) is a sentence that represents the Axiom of Choice.
    ZF (Zermelo-Fraenkel)(as a foundational axiom system)
    A standard set of basic rules that mathematicians use to build all of mathematics from the ground up, without making any extra assumptions.
    axioms(Stumpf, 1891)
    Propositions that we assume to be true and necessary, originating in the content of judgments.

    Related

    The semantics of second-order logic depend on the metatheory with respect to the...Whether 'N ⊨ θ' holds therefore depends on which model of ZF is taken as the met...

    Similar

    Sentences proved from first-order axioms are true in all models of tho...78%There exist countable transitive models M and M' (subsets of ZFC) such...77%For any sentence φ that characterizes a structure M up to isomorphism,...77%The Axiom of Choice holds for collections of non-empty finite sets in ...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: logic-higher-order
    View source passageHide passage
    Let \(\theta_{\le}(P,R)\) be the formula \[ \exists F\left(\forall x\,\forall y\left( (F(x)=F(y)\to x=y) \land(P(x)\to R(F(x)) \right)\right). \] Now \(\mm\models_s\theta_\le(P,R)\) if and only if \(|s(P)|\le |s(R)|\). Let \(\theta_{\textrm{EQ}}(P,R)\) be the formula \(\theta_{{\le}}(P,R)\land \theta_{{\le}}(R,P)\). Now \(\mm\models_s\phi(P,R)\) if and only if \(|s(P)|=|s(R)|\). Let \(\theta'_{\textrm{EC}}(Y)\) be \[ \exists F\left( \forall x\,\forall y((F(x)=F(y)\to x=y)\land R(F(x)))

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective