Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Calling the One 'Good' imports teleological relativity—goodness is relational (good *for* something), while the One is absolute.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.'Good' need not be relational; absolute goodness could mean the One is the source/standard of all value, not dependent on external reference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Calling the One 'good' may be metaphysically innocent—a regulative ideal pointing beyond language rather than a literal predicate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Rejecting 'good' altogether creates the problem: if the One is not good, why posit it as the ultimate principle worth contemplating?
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Relational predicates (good-for, hot-for) require a reference frame; absolute transcendence excludes such frames by definition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the One is truly beyond being, attributing functional properties (even 'good') reintroduces dependence on external benefit or purpose.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Neoplatonic henology consistently denies predicative language of the One; 'good' as a predicate violates apophatic principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.