Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Calling the One 'Good' imports teleological relativity—go... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The One is identical with the Good

    Calling the One 'Good' imports teleological relativity—goodness is relational (good *for* something), while the One is absolute.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Relational predicates (good-for, hot-for) require a reference frame; absolute transcendence excludes such frames by definition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the One is truly beyond being, attributing functional properties (even 'good') reintroduces dependence on external benefit or purpose.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Neoplatonic henology consistently denies predicative language of the One; 'good' as a predicate violates apophatic principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.'Good' need not be relational; absolute goodness could mean the One is the source/standard of all value, not dependent on external reference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Calling the One 'good' may be metaphysically innocent—a regulative ideal pointing beyond language rather than a literal predicate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Rejecting 'good' altogether creates the problem: if the One is not good, why posit it as the ultimate principle worth contemplating?
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Natural Theology1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    'Good' need not be relational; absolute goodness could mean the One is the sourc...Calling the One 'good' may be metaphysically innocent—a regulative ideal pointin...If the One is truly beyond being, attributing functional properties (even 'good'...Neoplatonic henology consistently denies predicative language of the One; 'good'...
    +3 moreShow less
    Rejecting 'good' altogether creates the problem: if the One is not good, why pos...Relational predicates (good-for, hot-for) require a reference frame; absolute tr...The One is identical with the Good

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit