Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Causal connection alone is insufficient for a process to ... — Carmelics
    Home/Consciousness & Mind
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Causal connection alone is insufficient for a process to count as a constituent part of another process.

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    2 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Mechanistic constitution, as defended by Machamer, Darden, and Craver, requires that a part contribute to a mechanism's organized activity, not merely influence it.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Craver's 'mutual manipulability' criterion holds that a component must be interventionally relevant to the phenomenon at multiple levels, not merely downstream in a causal chain.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Causal relevance is transitive and ubiquitous, so any criterion admitting all causal connections collapses the distinction between environment and mechanism entirely.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Salmon's process ontology distinguishes genuine causal processes, which transmit marks and conserved quantities, from mere causal interactions that produce no structural modification in a persisting process.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A pencil's sound transmits no conserved quantity into the writing loop and leaves no mark on the neural-motor-graphite process, failing Salmon's criterion for genuine process membership.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Only processes that can receive and transmit modifications internal to a system's productive continuity qualify as constituents under a Salmon-Dowe transference account.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Coupling arguments require that process X be more than simply causally connected to process Y of type j for X to be part of the j process.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The sound of a pencil leaving graphite is causally connected to the production of a written paragraph.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The sound of the pencil does not contribute to the loop—neural events, scribbling, reading—from which the paragraph emerges.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Topics

    Consciousness & MindCausation

    Related

    A pencil's sound transmits no conserved quantity into the writing loop and leave...Causal relevance is transitive and ubiquitous, so any criterion admitting all ca...Coupling arguments require that process X be more than simply causally connected...Craver's 'mutual manipulability' criterion holds that a component must be interv...
    +6 moreShow less
    Mechanistic constitution, as defended by Machamer, Darden, and Craver, requires ...Only processes that can receive and transmit modifications internal to a system'...Salmon's process ontology distinguishes genuine causal processes, which transmit...The sound of a pencil leaving graphite is causally connected to the production o...The sound of the pencil does not contribute to the loop—neural events, scribblin...Therefore, the sound is not a constituent in the system that results in the writ...

    Similar

    Coupling arguments require that process X be more than simply causally...78%Independent (non-internal) relations cannot serve as the relating rela...74%Kant agrees with Hume that necessary connection is an essential ingred...74%InternalB relations cannot serve as the relating relation between A an...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: embodied-cognition
    View source passageHide passage
    This response is unlikely to impress supporters of coupling arguments for Constitution. Firstly, coupling arguments require that process X be more than simply causally connected to process Y of type j for X to be part of the j process. Suppose that process Y of type j is the production of a written paragraph on a piece of paper. Let X be the sound of the pencil as it leaves graphite on the surface of the paper. The sound is causally connected to the production of writing, but defenders of Consti
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (2 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit