Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Chalmers' conceivability of philosophical zombies demonstrates that S can be true while S# remains epistemically independent, undermining the claim of mere expansion.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Conceivability does not entail metaphysical possibility; we can coherently imagine scenarios that are actually impossible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The epistemic gap reflects limitations in human deduction, not metaphysical independence of consciousness from physical properties.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.S# may be necessitated by S once we fully understand consciousness, making apparent independence an artifact of incomplete analysis.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Zombies are coherently conceivable: we can imagine beings physically identical to us yet lacking consciousness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If S (physical facts) and S# (consciousness facts) were merely expanding descriptions of the same reality, S# would be deducible from S.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The epistemic gap between physical and phenomenal properties shows consciousness adds genuinely new information beyond physical expansion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.