Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Chalmers' positive conceivability test—where no contradic... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Zombies are possible

    Chalmers' positive conceivability test—where no contradiction emerges after ideal rational reflection—is a reliable guide to metaphysical possibility.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.If ideal rational reflection cannot find contradictions, no logical laws are violated, suggesting genuine metaphysical possibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We lack direct access to metaphysical possibility independent of conceivability, making rational conceivability our best epistemic guide.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This test successfully distinguishes impossible scenarios (married bachelor) from possible ones (water as XYZ), validating its reliability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Conceivability can diverge from possibility: we might ideally conceive zombies, yet they're metaphysically impossible if physicalism holds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Our rational capacities evolved for practical survival, not metaphysical truth-tracking, so conceivability may systematically mislead us.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Complex scenarios (quantum entanglement, consciousness) seem conceivable but remain metaphysically opaque to human rational reflection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Complex scenarios (quantum entanglement, consciousness) seem conceivable but rem...Conceivability can diverge from possibility: we might ideally conceive zombies, ...If ideal rational reflection cannot find contradictions, no logical laws are vio...Our rational capacities evolved for practical survival, not metaphysical truth-t...
    +3 moreShow less
    This test successfully distinguishes impossible scenarios (married bachelor) fro...We lack direct access to metaphysical possibility independent of conceivability,...Zombies are possible

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit