Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Chalmers' positive conceivability test—where no contradiction emerges after ideal rational reflection—is a reliable guide to metaphysical possibility.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Conceivability can diverge from possibility: we might ideally conceive zombies, yet they're metaphysically impossible if physicalism holds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Our rational capacities evolved for practical survival, not metaphysical truth-tracking, so conceivability may systematically mislead us.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Complex scenarios (quantum entanglement, consciousness) seem conceivable but remain metaphysically opaque to human rational reflection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If ideal rational reflection cannot find contradictions, no logical laws are violated, suggesting genuine metaphysical possibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We lack direct access to metaphysical possibility independent of conceivability, making rational conceivability our best epistemic guide.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This test successfully distinguishes impossible scenarios (married bachelor) from possible ones (water as XYZ), validating its reliability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.