Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Clifton's argument depends on a state that may be difficult to produce or isolate
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Experimental difficulty in producing a state is an engineering constraint, not a principled logical or metaphysical objection to an argument's validity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The history of physics shows that states once deemed practically inaccessible (e.g., single-photon states) later became routine laboratory preparations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Theoretical arguments in quantum foundations, like Bell's theorem, retain their philosophical force independently of whether ideal experimental conditions are fully achievable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Clifton's argument targets the logical consistency of hidden-variable assignments, a domain where practical realizability of states is conceptually irrelevant to the proof's soundness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Clifton's argument requires fixing a state experimentally where v(Sx)=0
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Fixing such a state experimentally is not an easy matter
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42