Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Collective moral responsibility cannot be transferred to ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Some acts or campaigns of terrorist violence against non-combatants can be justified

    Collective moral responsibility cannot be transferred to individuals who lack direct causal agency over institutional wrongs.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Moral responsibility requires causal power: one cannot be obligated to fix what one cannot influence or control.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Holding non-causal agents responsible is unjust; it punishes people for others' decisions and actions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Collective responsibility diffuses accountability, making it harder to identify and reform actual wrongdoers.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Individuals benefit from institutional wrongs (unjust salaries, stolen land) regardless of direct causal role.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Moral responsibility includes duties to reform unjust systems one participates in, even without sole causation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Requiring direct causal agency protects beneficiaries of injustice from remedial obligations they easily avoid.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism1 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Collective responsibility diffuses accountability, making it harder to identify ...Holding non-causal agents responsible is unjust; it punishes people for others' ...Individuals benefit from institutional wrongs (unjust salaries, stolen land) reg...Moral responsibility includes duties to reform unjust systems one participates i...
    +3 moreShow less
    Moral responsibility requires causal power: one cannot be obligated to fix what ...Requiring direct causal agency protects beneficiaries of injustice from remedial...Some acts or campaigns of terrorist violence against non-combatants can be justi...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit