Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Collective moral responsibility cannot be transferred to individuals who lack direct causal agency over institutional wrongs.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Individuals benefit from institutional wrongs (unjust salaries, stolen land) regardless of direct causal role.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Moral responsibility includes duties to reform unjust systems one participates in, even without sole causation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Requiring direct causal agency protects beneficiaries of injustice from remedial obligations they easily avoid.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Moral responsibility requires causal power: one cannot be obligated to fix what one cannot influence or control.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Holding non-causal agents responsible is unjust; it punishes people for others' decisions and actions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Collective responsibility diffuses accountability, making it harder to identify and reform actual wrongdoers.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.