Commodification of procreative inputs (egg/sperm donation, surrogacy services) differs categorically from commodifying the child; treating labor as commodity need not commodify the person produced.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Categorically different(arguing that weak dominance is not a weaker version of strong dominance, but something entirely separate): Fundamentally different in kind or type, rather than just different in degree or strength—like how a dog differs from a rock, not just like how a large dog differs from a small one.
Commodification(as used in ethics and social philosophy): Treating something that isn't normally bought and sold—like relationships, body parts, or in this case, reproduction—as if it were a product with a price tag.
Procreative inputs(as used in bioethics): The biological materials and processes involved in creating a baby, such as eggs, sperm, or the ability to carry a pregnancy.
Surrogacy(as used in ethics and bioethics): An arrangement where one woman agrees to become pregnant and give birth to a child for another person or couple who cannot have children themselves.

Based on where you are in your exploration