Conflating predictability-in-principle with determinism commits a category error: Laplace's demon argument was always about metaphysical sufficiency of causes, not human computational limits.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
The idea that something could theoretically be predicted if you had enough information and computing power, even if it's practically impossible for humans to actually predict it.
Sufficiency of causes(as used in causality and philosophy of science)
The idea that the prior conditions (causes) are enough by themselves to guarantee a particular outcome will happen.
determinism(Discussion of classical mechanics, quantum mechanics, and general relativity)
A property of physical theories concerning whether the laws governing a system fully fix future (and past) states given present conditions; admits of degrees ('fall only a bit short')
metaphysical(Ayer's Logical Positivist usage)
Language that purports to refer beyond the physical world and lacks empirical consequences, which Ayer classifies as not literally significant