Consequentialist moral frameworks, defended by Mill and later Parfit, entail that the wrongness of an act just is constituted by its axiological deficit, making deontological supplementation redundant.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Axiological deficit(as used in ethics to describe what makes actions wrong): A situation where something is missing in value or goodness—like when an action produces less overall well-being or benefit than it could have.
Deontological(as used in moral philosophy): An approach to ethics that focuses on whether actions follow rules and duties, rather than on whether they produce good outcomes.
Mill(as the subject being discussed): John Stuart Mill was a 19th-century British philosopher who wrote influential ideas about liberty, happiness, and what makes a good life.
Moral frameworks(as used in ethics): A system or set of principles that helps us decide what is right and wrong.
Parfit: Derek Parfit was a highly influential British philosopher known for revolutionizing how we think about personal identity, morality, and what makes life worth living. He argued that our sense of being a continuous, unified "self" is partly an illusion, and that what really matters is the continuation of our thoughts and experiences, not some invisible thread connecting us through time. His ideas have shaped modern ethics and how philosophers approach questions about identity, responsibility, and how we should treat future generations.

Based on where you are in your exploration