Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Crimes against international law should be addressed by p... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Crimes against international law should be addressed by punishing individuals rather than abstract entities.

    Justice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Crimes against international law are committed by men, not by abstract entities.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Only by punishing individuals who commit such crimes can the provisions of international law be enforced.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & Punishment

    Related

    Crimes against international law are committed by men, not by abstract entities.Only by punishing individuals who commit such crimes can the provisions of inter...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Only by punishing individuals who commit such crimes can the provision...85%Crimes against international law are committed by men, not by abstract...84%A theory of punishment must also address its rationale and justificati...74%The imposition of punishment in the international context raises disti...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: legal-punishment
    View source passageHide passage
    This kind of account does indeed answer the two questions noted above. What the criminal deserves to suffer is the loss of her unfair advantage, and she deserves that because it is unfair that she should get away with taking the benefits of the law without accepting the burdens on which those benefits depend; it is the state’s job to inflict this suffering on her, because it is the author or guarantor of the criminal law. However, such accounts have internal difficulties: for instance, how are we to determine how great was the unfair advantage gained by a crime; how far are such measurements o...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit