Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Damian distinguishes between God's absolute power (potentia absoluta) and ordained power, restricting omnipotence claims to the former.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
The distinction creates a problematic two-tier concept of power, suggesting God's real omnipotence is only exercised arbitrarily outside creation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If God genuinely restricts His own power through ordained order, He is not truly omnipotent in the classical sense—omnipotence should admit no real limitations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The distinction lacks coherent definition: 'absolute power' becomes meaningless if exercised nowhere, or contradictory if applied to logically impossible acts.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Distinguishing absolute from ordained power resolves the logical problem of whether God can do logically contradictory things like create square circles.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Medieval theologians needed this distinction to reconcile God's omnipotence with His self-imposed constraints through creation and natural laws.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Restricting omnipotence claims to absolute power preserves God's transcendence while allowing meaningful human freedom and stable moral order.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.