Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Damian does not deserve his reputation as a thinker who d... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Damian does not deserve his reputation as a thinker who denies the universal validity of the principle of non-contradiction in order to defend divine omnipotence

    Against an attribute of GodDivine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • Passage 612A–B is too ambiguous to support any substantial claims about Damian's view on the principle of non-contradiction
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesAgainst an attribute of God

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    1 linked
    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    Passage 612A–B is too ambiguous to support any substantial claims about Damian's...

    Similar

    The validity of the principle of non-contradiction is a consequence of...85%Damian has to deny the universal validity of the principle of non-cont...84%Damian's position does not require him to deny the universal validity ...83%The principle of non-contradiction is universally valid for everything...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: peter-damian
    View source passageHide passage
    Passage 612A–B is too ambiguous to support any substantial claims about Damian’s view; Damian does not deserve his reputation as a thinker who denies the universal validity of the principle of non-contradiction in order to defend the divine omnipotence. (At the same time, it must be added that Damian is not quite clear about the validity of the principle of non-contradiction for those things for which God is not responsible. See Section 5.1.)
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit