Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Decision-making authority cannot be partial — either a pa... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→For practical purposes, a ruling on decisional capacity must be all-or-nothing (bivalent), not a matter of degree.

    Decision-making authority cannot be partial — either a patient has final authority over a decision or someone else does.

    BioethicsRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsRights & Liberty

    Connections

    2 topics

    Justice & Punishment2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility
    1 linked

    Related

    For practical purposes, a ruling on decisional capacity must be all-or-nothing (...If a patient has decisional capacity to make decision X, others must honor her c...If a patient lacks decisional capacity to make decision X, a guardian or surroga...To avoid potentially endless controversy and ensure smooth operation of the heal...

    Similar

    If a patient lacks decisional capacity to make decision X, a guardian ...79%If a patient has decisional capacity to make decision X, others must h...79%To avoid potentially endless controversy and ensure smooth operation o...75%No single person or authority can make a choice about ends that is rig...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: decision-capacity
    View source passageHide passage
    A third assumption that pervades contemporary work on decisional capacity is that for practical purposes, a ruling on capacity must be all-or-nothing: either the patient in question has decisional capacity or she lacks it. Of course, in many contexts there is an obvious sense in which we can speak meaningfully of “degrees” of capacity, for we are indeed measuring abilities that fall along a spectrum. However, in practice we need a judgment of a bivalent type. This is because we need to know who

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective