Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    To avoid potentially endless controversy and ensure smoot... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→For practical purposes, a ruling on decisional capacity must be all-or-nothing (bivalent), not a matter of degree.

    To avoid potentially endless controversy and ensure smooth operation of the healthcare system, law and practice require a yes-or-no verdict about whether a person can make a particular decision.

    BioethicsJustice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsJustice & Punishment

    Key Terms

    Capacity to make a decision(as used in medical ethics and law)
    The legal and mental ability to understand information, weigh options, and make a choice about something that affects you—like medical treatment.
    Potentially endless controversy(as used in philosophy and policy discussion)
    A disagreement or debate that could keep going forever without reaching agreement if rules don't force a final answer.
    Verdict

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    (as used in legal and healthcare contexts)
    An official decision or judgment, typically a clear yes-or-no answer rather than something in between.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Rights & Liberty2 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Decision-making authority cannot be partial — either a patient has final authori...For practical purposes, a ruling on decisional capacity must be all-or-nothing (...If a patient has decisional capacity to make decision X, others must honor her c...If a patient lacks decisional capacity to make decision X, a guardian or surroga...

    Similar

    If a patient has decisional capacity to make decision X, others must h...80%If a patient lacks decisional capacity to make decision X, a guardian ...76%Decision-making authority cannot be partial — either a patient has fin...75%Understanding alone at the level of basic comprehension of facts is in...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: decision-capacity
    View source passageHide passage
    A third assumption that pervades contemporary work on decisional capacity is that for practical purposes, a ruling on capacity must be all-or-nothing: either the patient in question has decisional capacity or she lacks it. Of course, in many contexts there is an obvious sense in which we can speak meaningfully of “degrees” of capacity, for we are indeed measuring abilities that fall along a spectrum. However, in practice we need a judgment of a bivalent type. This is because we need to know who

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective