Deliberation, as Aristotle argues in Nicomachean Ethics III, is only possible about what is genuinely open, so tying rationality to fixed futures collapses practical reason into fatalism.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Aristotle: Aristotle was an ancient Greek philosopher who lived over 2,000 years ago and is one of the most influential thinkers in Western history. He studied nearly every subject—from animals and plants to politics and ethics—and developed practical ways of thinking that shaped how people understand the world. His ideas on logic, nature, and how to live a good life are still taught and debated today because he focused on observing the real world rather than just abstract theories.
Fixed futures(as the concept that would make deliberation impossible): The idea that what will happen in the future is already decided and unchangeable, leaving no room for real choice.
Nicomachean Ethics(as an ancient ethical text): Aristotle's main book about how to live well and what makes a good person, organized around virtues like courage and honesty.
deliberation(Aristotelian practical reasoning): A form of practical reasoning in which an agent has some end and reasons to a sufficient means for achieving that end.
fatalism(Presented as a consequence allegedly entailed by backward causation.): The view that all events are fixed in advance and inevitable, such that agents cannot do otherwise than they do.
practical reason(Kantian moral philosophy): The rational faculty by which agents determine what is morally valuable and impose the moral law upon themselves.

2 topics