Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Deliberation, as Aristotle argues in Nicomachean Ethics III, is only possible about what is genuinely open, so tying rationality to fixed futures collapses practical reason into fatalism.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Determinism about outcomes doesn't entail fatalism if our deliberation causally produces those determined outcomes.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Deliberation can be rational even if constrained by prior conditions; openness needn't mean uncaused or indeterminate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The Aristotelian framework assumes libertarian free will, but compatibilists offer rational deliberation within causal determinism.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Deliberation requires agents to weigh alternatives as genuinely possible; if futures are fixed, no alternative is truly open.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Fatalism treats rational deliberation as epiphenomenal—mere illusion of choice—undermining moral responsibility and agency.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Aristotle's account of praktike requires that what we deliberate about (means to ends) be causally dependent on our reasoning.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.