Dennett's critique in 'Elbow Room' establishes that incompatibilists systematically conflate the inability to alter the laws of nature with the absence of meaningful agentive control.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Agentive control(as what the statement argues incompatibilists confuse with escaping the laws of nature): The ability to make real choices and direct your own actions based on your own desires and reasoning, rather than being forced by outside circumstances.
Conflate(the criticism being made in the statement): To mistakenly treat two different things as if they were the same thing.
Dennett: Daniel Dennett is a prominent American philosopher best known for his unconventional ideas about consciousness and the mind. He argues that consciousness isn't some magical or mysterious thing but rather arises from the physical processes of the brain, and he challenges the intuitive feeling that we have a unified "self" watching our experiences like a theater audience. His work is important because he bridges philosophy, science, and everyday thinking, making complex ideas about minds and free will accessible to general audiences.
Determinism / Laws of nature(as what incompatibilists claim we cannot escape)

Based on where you are in your exploration