Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Descartes' argument from conceivability—that mind can be ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The mind is distinct from the body

    Descartes' argument from conceivability—that mind can be clearly conceived without body—does not establish real distinctness, since conceivability does not entail metaphysical possibility, as Kripke's work on necessary a posteriori truths demonstrates.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Water is conceivable as H2O-independent, yet necessarily is H2O; conceivability thus permits false metaphysical conclusions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Epistemic conceivability (imaginability) tracks our knowledge limitations, not metaphysical possibility itself.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If conceivability established real distinctness, we'd wrongly infer consciousness could exist without any physical substrate whatsoever.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Kripke's necessary a posteriori truths involve empirical discovery of essences; mind-body separability requires no empirical discovery.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Conceivability of disembodied mind differs from water-without-H2O: mind's properties seem intrinsically non-physical, not merely appearance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The argument works on rational conceivability, not mere imaginability; rational coherence of dualism deserves metaphysical weight.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Descartes
    # Descartes René Descartes was a French philosopher and mathematician from the 1600s who fundamentally changed how people think about knowledge and the mind. He's famous for the idea "I think, therefore I am" (cogito ergo sum), which means that the very fact that you can think proves you exist—a foundation for modern philosophy. He also invented the coordinate system used in mathematics (the x and y axes on a graph), which connects geometry and algebra in practical ways we still use today.
    Kripke
    Kripke refers to Saul Kripke, an influential American philosopher and logician known for revolutionizing how we think about names, meaning, and possibility. He argued that names like "Albert Einstein" refer directly to the actual person rather than through descriptions of their properties, which changed philosophy fundamentally. His work also introduced "possible worlds" as a way to understand concepts like necessity and possibility, making him one of the most important philosophers of the 20th century.
    Mind-Body Problem(Traditional philosophy of mind)
    The metaphysical question concerning the status of mind in relation to the physical world
    Necessary a posteriori truths(Kripke's example of truths that show conceivability can mislead us about what's really possible)
    Facts that are definitely, absolutely true about how reality works, but can only be discovered through experience or observation rather than pure thinking.
    Real distinctness(what Descartes was trying to prove about mind and body)
    The claim that two things are actually separate or different in reality, not just in how we think about them.
    a posteriori(Used to classify the epistemic status of necessary statements post-Kripke)
    Knowable, but not independently of empirical experience
    a priori(Frege treats 'analytic' as entailing 'a priori' for arithmetic.)
    Knowable independently of empirical experience; here treated as a consequence of analyticity.
    conceivability(Qualified as 'properly circumscribed' to distinguish it from naive or unreflective conceivability)
    The ability to coherently imagine or suppose a state of affairs without contradiction
    metaphysical possibility(Distinguished from mathematical possibility to argue that some mathematically consistent results are ruled out by the nature of concrete reality)
    What is possible in the concrete world, which is a more restrictive domain than mathematical possibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    Conceivability of disembodied mind differs from water-without-H2O: mind's proper...Epistemic conceivability (imaginability) tracks our knowledge limitations, not m...If conceivability established real distinctness, we'd wrongly infer consciousnes...Kripke's necessary a posteriori truths involve empirical discovery of essences; ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    +3 moreShow less
    The argument works on rational conceivability, not mere imaginability; rational ...The mind is distinct from the bodyWater is conceivable as H2O-independent, yet necessarily is H2O; conceivability ...