Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Descartes demonstrated that systematic doubt can isolate indubitable foundations, showing apodictic certainty is achievable beyond mere self-evident principles.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.The cogito assumes the indubitability of logical laws themselves, which cannot be independently grounded without circular reasoning.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Descartes' certainty about the thinking subject conflates psychological immediacy with genuine metaphysical indubitably.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Systematic doubt cannot escape the problem of the criterion: justifying which doubts to accept requires standards already in question.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Cogito ergo sum survives all doubt because doubting itself requires a thinking subject, making it logically indubitable.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Systematic doubt successfully brackets empirical uncertainty, revealing a residual certainty inaccessible to mere introspection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Apodictic certainty differs from self-evidence by being grounded in logical necessity rather than intuitive obviousness alone.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.